Waking Up from the American Dream

Hedrick Smith is a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, an Emmy Award-winning producer, and the author of the recent book, Who Stole the American Dream?.

-How would you define the American Dream?
-It was pretty simple to define the American Dream in the ’40s, ’50s, ’60s, and ’70s, because so many people were living it. It was a steady job with steadily rising pay over your lifetime career, health benefits, a lifetime pension from your employer, the opportunity to buy your own home, and the hope that your kids would live a better life.
-Is it really a uniquely American concept?
-No, I don’t think so at all. I think people in Canada and Germany and England and France and Asia aspire to the same thing. It’s pretty basic.
I think the reason people think of it as the American Dream is that so many people in America achieved it. In the 1950s, when Richard Nixon had his famous “kitchen debate” with then Premier of the Soviet Union Nikita Khrushchev, Nixon said, “We’re the ones who have a truly classless society – you Communists boast about a classless society, but we have it.” So, I think it became embedded in the American political and economic psyche that that’s what should be delivered.
-What was Henry Ford’s role in the American Dream?
-Ford instituted the $5 day. That doesn’t sound like much today, but at the time he instituted it back in 1914, that was a tremendous pay boost for ordinary workers in the Ford plants that were making Model T cars.
Ford reasoned that this was not only fair, but was also good business: If you pay people well, they can become good consumers, and if they’re good consumers they can buy Model T cars and everything else.
What Ford was talking about, without articulating the whole theory, was what became known among economists as the “virtuous circle of growth.”
General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, U.S. Steel, General Electric … all kinds of big companies did this. They had contracts with strong unions back in the ’40s, ’50s, and ’60s. They had solid job guarantees, good pay, health benefits, lifetime pensions … the kinds of things that were the bedrock of the American Dream.
When they paid well, their tens of millions of workers went out and spent that money, and all that consumption is what drove the American economy. Corporations responded by expanding their production, hiring more workers, building new plants, and buying new equipment, and that spawned another cycle of growth. This went on for 30 or 40 years.
Now, we’ve dismantled that. This whole drive to cut pay, cut jobs, and downsize offshore has not only hurt the middle class, it has hurt economic growth generally.
Caterpillar ¬– a big manufacturer of farm equipment out in the Midwest – had record profits in 2011, and imposed a wage freeze on its workers. That means the corporate bosses and the Wall Street investors are going to make more money, but the workers are going to take it in the neck. And they’re not going to have the purchasing power to help drive the American economy.
Here we are, 41 months after the bottom of the recession, and we still have high unemployment. Everybody’s blaming Washington and Obama, but the real problem lies in the private sector. The private sector’s been sitting on nearly $2 trillion, spending $500 billion buying back their own stock instead of hiring people, expanding, and paying their workers more.
-What are the consequences of that?
-The long-term consequences are slow growth, stagnant living standards for the American middle class, and a mediocre economic performance – not just this year, not just next year, but over a long time.
People forget that there have been other periods in American history – not just the Great Depression of the 1930s, but the long depression of the 1880s and 1890s – where this pattern of concentrated wealth, suppressed wages, and slow growth took place. We could live with that kind of situation for 20 or 30 years.
-Does the American Dream, such as it were, still exist anywhere other than America?
-I think it’s coming to fruition in a bunch of countries. The Germans, for instance, have done an awful lot better for their economy and their middle class than we have in America. German average wages since 1985 have risen five times as fast as in America. In the 2000 decade, Germany ran a $2 trillion trade surplus – shipping out more than it was buying from the world – and the United States ran up a $6 trillion trade deficit. The Germans were pursuing a social contract that protected the German Dream, if you will, much better than we protected the American Dream. And it not only paid off for the middle class, it paid off for the country as a whole.
-Do you think the American Dream will ever return to America?
-That’s the $64,000 question. A lot of it depends on whether enough average Americans come to understand why they’re in such trouble: that the problems lie in the wedge economics being practiced by a lot of American corporations and the dramatic power shift that’s taking place in the American political system that leaves it dominated by corporate money – Wall Street money.
Enough people need to decide that these conditions are intolerable, and demand that the powers that be in the economy and the political system do something different to help average Americans more, and to have a fair share of the prosperity when America grows.
-Is that what the Occupy movement was trying to accomplish?
-The Occupy movement articulated the anger and frustration of many Americans. And it did implant, in the national political dialogue, the notion of the 1% and the 99%. Everybody talks about that now and understands it.
What Occupy didn’t do was organize a movement with clear goals, clear leadership, and wide popular support in the same way the civil-rights movement, the environmental movement, and the women’s movement did. It was a start, but it was incomplete.
I believe something’s going to emerge that will take its place and be more effective. There’s so much frustration and anger in the body politic in America today that I will be very surprised if something doesn’t happen.


Short URL: http://ubpost.mongolnews.mn/?p=1011

Posted by on Sep 17 2012. Filed under International. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply

+ 3 = 12

Recently Commented

  • Oyun: www.theblueeconomy.org
  • Honheree: It is a sad and awful sight to see so many animals dead from dzuds. These have happened in the past and since 2004 there have...
  • Harvey Dent: Mongolia does not get 476,000 tourists a year. Its gets 476,000 arrivals, most of these are Chinese construction workers....
  • Honheree: It is good but unusual that a Mongolian is so forthright. I am D. Ganbold will be criticised by Mongolians for telling the...
  • Honheree: Be thankful Mongolia is so cheap. In USA lamb in stores costs 69,281 MNT /kg and sirloin which is cheaper cut of beef is...